How the Negotiation Table Team Has Identified Fallback Positions to Secure Strategic Agility

Jim Bergman

Introduction: Fallback Positions Are Not Weakness – They’re Strategic Leverage
In high-stakes commercial negotiations, success rarely comes from rigid positions. Instead, seasoned negotiation teams create agility by identifying fallback positions – structured alternatives that preserve value even under pressure. These contingencies aren’t reactive compromises; they’re proactive strategies that ensure alignment, protect relationships, and sustain momentum toward agreement.

1. Codifying Fallbacks Around Core Contract Elements
The team has mapped fallback strategies for key contract dimensions to avoid deadlocks and accelerate progress:

  • Price vs. Term Flexibility: If price targets face resistance, shift to extended contract duration or phased cost reductions.
  • Service Levels: Where SLA thresholds are contested, introduce tiered performance models with incentives for improvement.
  • Liability Clauses: Instead of a fixed indemnity, propose capped liability plus mandatory insurance coverage.
  • Termination Rights: Offer mutual termination conditions with structured notice periods and exit support obligations.
  • Innovation Commitments: Transition from upfront R&D clauses to joint innovation boards and outcome-based funding triggers.

2. Pre-Negotiation Alignment on Tactical Boundaries
Before entering discussions, the team defined:

  • Must-Haves vs. Tradable Terms: Clear demarcation between non-negotiables and elements open to strategic movement.
  • Approval-Ready Alternatives: Each fallback was vetted internally with legal and executive stakeholders to speed up decision cycles.
  • Messaging Strategy: Fallback positions were paired with communication scripts to preserve confidence and demonstrate flexibility.

3. Leveraging Data to Justify and Sequence Fallbacks
Fallbacks aren’t introduced arbitrarily – they’re supported by insight:

  • Industry benchmarking on market norms for contested clauses
  • Supplier relationship history to predict response behaviors
  • Impact modeling to assess how fallback acceptance affects operational risk and strategic alignment

4. Strengthening Trust Through Transparent Fallback Disclosure
The team strategically chose moments to signal fallback readiness:

  • Using collaborative language (“Here’s another way we can structure this”)
  • Framing fallbacks as value-neutral alternatives, not concessions
  • Documenting fallback decisions in negotiation transcripts for audit and learning

Conclusion: Fallbacks as Strategic Safety Nets
By identifying fallback positions early and deploying them with precision, the negotiation table team demonstrated tactical maturity and strategic foresight. The result? Fewer impasses, stronger trust, and deal outcomes that advance enterprise goals while respecting counterpart interests.

Your thoughts?

Unknown's avatar

Published by Jim Bergman

Jim Bergman is a commercial contract professional with global experience spanning the USA, Latin America, UK, Europe, China, South Korea, Japan, India, SE Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Australia. He has worked on a wide range of direct and indirect spend categories in numerous sectors, developing a deep knowledge of services, goods and technology procurement and sales. Across this wide array of commodity and services experience, Jim has found the keys to success in maximizing value for money through customer-supplier relationships founded on innovative category management and strategic sourcing practices, key performance metrics and measures, as well as Total Cost of Ownership principles and collaborative contracting tenets. He has shared his knowledge through advisory engagements, as well as in developing and delivering training programs both on-line and in classrooms, in both open-enrollment and internal environments. Jim has assisted his clients through all phases and steps of contracting, negotiation, strategic sourcing and bidding processes, demonstrating value generation in excess of $250 million. His audiences and clients have included over 7,000 attorneys and commercial professionals students from over 1,000 corporations and public-sector entities.

Leave a comment