Are Contract Signatures Needed in the New Economy?

Jim Bergman

In an era defined by digital transformation, remote collaboration, and AI-assisted workflows, the humble contract signature is facing a quiet revolution. But does this traditional marker of agreement still hold legal weight in the new economy? Or are we witnessing the rise of more flexible, tech-enabled forms of consent?

Let’s unpack the legal foundations, explore jurisdictional nuances, and consider what this means for procurement and contract professionals navigating global frameworks.

The Legal Backbone: What Makes a Contract Binding?

At its core, a contract is a legally enforceable agreement between parties. While signatures have long served as a tangible expression of consent, they are not the sole determinant of enforceability.

Key Elements of a Valid Contract (Across Most Jurisdictions):

  • Offer and Acceptance: A clear proposal and unambiguous agreement.
  • Consideration: Something of value exchanged.
  • Intention to Create Legal Relations: Especially relevant in commercial contexts.
  • Capacity and Legality: Parties must be competent, and the contract must be lawful.

A signature is simply one way – albeit a powerful one – to demonstrate acceptance and intention.

Common Law vs. Civil Law: Diverging Views on Formality

The role of signatures varies significantly between legal systems, with implications for global contracting.

Common Law Systems (e.g., US, UK, Australia):

  • Flexibility is key: Contracts can be formed orally, via email, or even through conduct.
  • Signatures are helpful but not essential: Courts often prioritize the substance of the agreement over its form.
  • Electronic signatures: Widely accepted under laws like the U.S. E-SIGN Act and the UK’s Electronic Communications Act.

Civil Law Systems (e.g., France, Germany, Japan):

  • Greater emphasis on formalities: Written contracts and signatures are often required for enforceability.
  • Electronic signatures: Accepted, but may require advanced authentication (e.g., qualified electronic signatures under EU eIDAS regulation).
  • Notarial involvement: Certain contracts (e.g., real estate, wills) may require notarization or registration.

The Rise of Digital Consent and Smart Contracts

In the new economy, consent is increasingly captured through:

  • Clickwrap agreements: Users click “I agree” to terms – legally binding in many jurisdictions.
  • Blockchain-based smart contracts: Code executes terms automatically, raising novel questions about intent and enforceability.
  • AI-assisted negotiations: Where machine-generated terms may require human validation.

These innovations challenge traditional notions of “signing” and invite a rethinking of what constitutes informed, voluntary agreement.

Practical Implications for Procurement Professionals

As contracting becomes more decentralized and digital:

  • Know your jurisdiction: Signature requirements vary – especially in cross-border deals.
  • Audit your workflows: Ensure electronic consent mechanisms meet legal standards.
  • Train stakeholders: Legal literacy around digital contracting is essential.
  • Document intent clearly: Whether via signature, email, or platform logs, clarity is king.

Final Thought: Signatures as Symbol, Not Necessity

In many cases, signatures remain a powerful symbol of trust and accountability. But in the new economy, they are no longer the gatekeepers of enforceability. The real question is not whether a signature exists – but whether the parties intended to be bound, and whether that intent is clearly documented.

Your thoughts?

Unknown's avatar

Published by Jim Bergman

Jim Bergman is a commercial contract professional with global experience spanning the USA, Latin America, UK, Europe, China, South Korea, Japan, India, SE Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Australia. He has worked on a wide range of direct and indirect spend categories in numerous sectors, developing a deep knowledge of services, goods and technology procurement and sales. Across this wide array of commodity and services experience, Jim has found the keys to success in maximizing value for money through customer-supplier relationships founded on innovative category management and strategic sourcing practices, key performance metrics and measures, as well as Total Cost of Ownership principles and collaborative contracting tenets. He has shared his knowledge through advisory engagements, as well as in developing and delivering training programs both on-line and in classrooms, in both open-enrollment and internal environments. Jim has assisted his clients through all phases and steps of contracting, negotiation, strategic sourcing and bidding processes, demonstrating value generation in excess of $250 million. His audiences and clients have included over 7,000 attorneys and commercial professionals students from over 1,000 corporations and public-sector entities.

Leave a comment