Nine Reasons Supplier Relationship Management Processes and Plans Need to Be Defined in the Contract Kickoff Implementation Stage

Jim Bergman

Embedding Accountability, Continuity, and Strategic Value from Day One

Contract execution is not just about deliverables—it’s about relationships. Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) is the discipline that ensures vendors are not just compliant, but collaborative; not just reactive, but strategic. Yet too often, SRM is treated as a post-launch activity, disconnected from the initial implementation. This is a missed opportunity.

The contract kickoff meeting is the ideal moment to embed SRM processes and plans. It’s when expectations are clarified, roles are assigned, and operational rhythms are established. Whether you’re launching a multi-year vendor engagement, a grant-funded initiative, or a shared services transformation, here are nine reasons why SRM must be defined at the kickoff stage—with examples drawn from six distinct sectors.

1. Establishes Mutual Accountability Early

SRM begins with shared ownership—not just oversight.

Defining SRM at kickoff ensures that both parties understand their responsibilities beyond the contract terms. It sets the tone for proactive engagement, issue resolution, and performance improvement.

  • In higher education, a university partnering with a learning platform provider must clarify who owns faculty onboarding, content migration, and accessibility compliance. If SRM roles are vague, delays and finger-pointing are inevitable.
  • In public sector procurement, a city contracting for waste management services must define how vendor performance will be tracked and how service complaints will be escalated. Without SRM protocols, public trust erodes.
  • In healthcare, a hospital implementing a diagnostic imaging system must establish how the vendor will support clinical staff post-installation. If SRM is absent, support requests may be routed inefficiently or ignored.

2. Aligns Relationship Goals with Contract Objectives

Execution must reflect strategic intent.

Contracts are signed to achieve specific outcomes—cost savings, service quality, innovation. SRM ensures that supplier engagement supports these goals. Defining SRM at kickoff aligns relationship management with contract performance.

  • In regulated utilities, a grid modernization contract may aim to improve outage response times. SRM must include joint reviews of incident data and collaborative planning for system upgrades.
  • In shared services, a centralized procurement platform may aim to reduce maverick spend. SRM must include vendor training, catalog updates, and feedback loops to ensure compliance.
  • In global supply chain operations, a vendor-managed inventory program may target reduced stockouts. SRM must include shared forecasting, exception reporting, and replenishment protocols.

3. Prevents Misalignment on Communication Protocols

Clarity on how, when, and why we communicate.

SRM depends on disciplined communication. Defining protocols at kickoff—who sends updates, how often, through what channels—prevents confusion and ensures responsiveness.

  • In higher education, faculty may need weekly updates on platform performance, while IT requires monthly system health reports. SRM must reflect these rhythms.
  • In public sector projects, elected officials may require quarterly vendor performance summaries. SRM must include public-facing reporting protocols.
  • In healthcare, clinical teams may need immediate escalation paths for system issues. SRM must define who responds, how quickly, and with what authority.

4. Embeds Risk Management into Relationship Structures

Risks are best managed collaboratively.

Defining SRM at kickoff allows both parties to identify risks and agree on mitigation strategies. It ensures that vendors are not just informed—but involved.

  • In regulated utilities, risks may include permitting delays or equipment failures. SRM must include joint risk registers and contingency planning.
  • In shared services, risks may involve data migration errors or policy misalignment. SRM must include escalation protocols and root cause analysis procedures.
  • In global operations, risks may include customs delays or geopolitical disruptions. SRM must include alternate sourcing plans and real-time communication channels.

5. Supports Performance Monitoring and Continuous Improvement

SRM is not static—it evolves.

Kickoff is the time to define how performance will be measured, reviewed, and improved. SRM plans must include KPIs, review cadences, and feedback mechanisms.

  • In higher education, performance may include system uptime, user satisfaction, and support responsiveness. SRM must include dashboards and quarterly reviews.
  • In public sector procurement, performance may include service delivery metrics, compliance rates, and community feedback. SRM must include scorecards and corrective action plans.
  • In healthcare, performance may include clinical workflow alignment, training effectiveness, and incident resolution. SRM must include joint audits and optimization sessions.

6. Clarifies Escalation Paths and Decision Rights

When issues arise, clarity prevents chaos.

Defining SRM at kickoff ensures that escalation paths are known and decision rights are respected. It prevents delays, duplication, and miscommunication.

  • In regulated utilities, escalation may involve safety incidents or regulatory breaches. SRM must include immediate notification protocols and executive oversight.
  • In shared services, escalation may involve system outages or policy conflicts. SRM must define who resolves what—and how quickly.
  • In global supply chain operations, escalation may involve delivery failures or contract disputes. SRM must include regional escalation paths and centralized arbitration procedures.

7. Enables Relationship Continuity Through Staff Changes

SRM survives turnover when it’s documented.

People change—but relationships must endure. Defining SRM at kickoff ensures that roles, protocols, and expectations are documented and transferable.

  • In higher education, if the faculty liaison leaves mid-implementation, SRM documentation ensures continuity in vendor engagement.
  • In public sector procurement, if the contract manager retires, SRM plans ensure that performance reviews and vendor communications continue seamlessly.
  • In healthcare, if the clinical champion transitions roles, SRM protocols ensure that training and support remain consistent.

8. Reinforces Governance and Compliance Discipline

SRM is part of contract governance—not separate from it.

Defining SRM at kickoff embeds it into governance structures. It ensures that relationship management is visible, auditable, and aligned with oversight bodies.

  • In regulated utilities, SRM must align with safety boards, environmental audits, and rate case filings.
  • In shared services, SRM must align with service level reviews, budget reconciliations, and internal controls.
  • In global operations, SRM must align with trade compliance, supplier diversity goals, and ethical sourcing standards.

9. Builds a Foundation for Strategic Partnership

SRM turns vendors into allies.

When SRM is defined early, vendors are treated not just as service providers—but as strategic partners. It fosters trust, innovation, and long-term value.

  • In higher education, vendors may co-develop training materials or analytics dashboards. SRM enables collaboration.
  • In public sector procurement, vendors may contribute to community engagement or sustainability initiatives. SRM enables alignment.
  • In healthcare, vendors may help optimize clinical workflows or co-author research. SRM enables shared impact.
  • In regulated utilities, vendors may support innovation pilots or grid resilience planning. SRM enables co-investment.
  • In shared services, vendors may help refine policies or improve user experience. SRM enables continuous improvement.
  • In global supply chain operations, vendors may share market intelligence or collaborate on risk mitigation. SRM enables agility.

Conclusion: SRM Starts at Kickoff—Not After Go-Live

Supplier Relationship Management is not a postscript—it’s a prerequisite. When SRM processes and plans are defined at the contract kickoff stage, implementation becomes not just compliant, but collaborative; not just functional, but strategic.

Across sectors—from higher education to healthcare, from public procurement to global operations—the message is clear: SRM is not optional. It’s foundational.

Your thoughts?

Unknown's avatar

Published by Jim Bergman

Jim Bergman is a commercial contract professional with global experience spanning the USA, Latin America, UK, Europe, China, South Korea, Japan, India, SE Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Australia. He has worked on a wide range of direct and indirect spend categories in numerous sectors, developing a deep knowledge of services, goods and technology procurement and sales. Across this wide array of commodity and services experience, Jim has found the keys to success in maximizing value for money through customer-supplier relationships founded on innovative category management and strategic sourcing practices, key performance metrics and measures, as well as Total Cost of Ownership principles and collaborative contracting tenets. He has shared his knowledge through advisory engagements, as well as in developing and delivering training programs both on-line and in classrooms, in both open-enrollment and internal environments. Jim has assisted his clients through all phases and steps of contracting, negotiation, strategic sourcing and bidding processes, demonstrating value generation in excess of $250 million. His audiences and clients have included over 7,000 attorneys and commercial professionals students from over 1,000 corporations and public-sector entities.

Leave a comment