The Power of Clarity: Defining Ownership and Accountability in the Tendering Process

Jim Bergman

In any organization, tendering is a critical function that ensures transparency, fairness, and cost-effectiveness in procurement. However, without clear ownership and accountability, the tendering process can become fragmented, inefficient, and vulnerable to risks. Establishing who owns the process and who is accountable for its quality is essential to ensure smooth operations, compliance, and optimal outcomes.

Why Clarity in Tendering Ownership Matters

Tendering involves multiple stakeholders—procurement teams, finance departments, legal advisors, and executives. Without a clearly defined owner, responsibility can become blurred, leading to:

  • Process inefficiencies from overlapping roles and unclear decision-making.
  • Increased risk exposure due to inconsistent oversight.
  • Delays in approvals, supplier evaluations, and contract finalization.

Organizations must explicitly designate ownership to a department or team that will manage the overall tendering process, ensuring structured workflows and alignment with corporate objectives.

Why Accountability for Tender Quality Is Critical

Ownership determines who runs the process, but accountability defines who ensures its quality. Without clear accountability, organizations may face:

  • Poor supplier selection, leading to financial losses and operational setbacks.
  • Non-compliance issues, resulting in legal risks and reputational damage.
  • Lack of transparency, causing trust erosion among stakeholders.

Setting accountability parameters ensures that performance metrics, compliance standards, and fairness are upheld.

Best Practices for Defining Ownership & Accountability

Designate a Tendering Authority

Identify a specific team or department responsible for managing the process. Whether it’s procurement, finance, or a dedicated bid management team, clarity reduces confusion.

Establish Roles & Responsibilities

Define who evaluates suppliers, who approves contracts, and who ensures compliance. Having a structured framework prevents inefficiencies.

Implement Quality Control Measures

Accountability requires checks and balances. Establish metrics to assess bid evaluations, supplier performance, and adherence to tender guidelines.

Encourage Collaboration Across Departments

Ownership doesn’t mean siloed control. Procurement, legal, finance, and operations should work together to ensure strategic decision-making.

Use Technology for Transparency

Digital tendering platforms help organizations track accountability by recording approvals, evaluations, and decision-making processes.

Conclusion

Clear ownership and accountability in tendering prevent confusion, inefficiencies, and risks. Organizations that define responsibilities, enforce quality controls, and promote transparency, strengthen their procurement strategies, and enhance supplier relationships. With clarity, tendering becomes a strategic advantage rather than a procedural hurdle.

Your thoughts?

Unknown's avatar

Published by Jim Bergman

Jim Bergman is a commercial contract professional with global experience spanning the USA, Latin America, UK, Europe, China, South Korea, Japan, India, SE Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Australia. He has worked on a wide range of direct and indirect spend categories in numerous sectors, developing a deep knowledge of services, goods and technology procurement and sales. Across this wide array of commodity and services experience, Jim has found the keys to success in maximizing value for money through customer-supplier relationships founded on innovative category management and strategic sourcing practices, key performance metrics and measures, as well as Total Cost of Ownership principles and collaborative contracting tenets. He has shared his knowledge through advisory engagements, as well as in developing and delivering training programs both on-line and in classrooms, in both open-enrollment and internal environments. Jim has assisted his clients through all phases and steps of contracting, negotiation, strategic sourcing and bidding processes, demonstrating value generation in excess of $250 million. His audiences and clients have included over 7,000 attorneys and commercial professionals students from over 1,000 corporations and public-sector entities.

Leave a comment